Europe’s reliance on Russian natural gas, highlighted by the Russian-Ukraine conflict, poses a significant energy security risk. To address this, Europe must urgently reduce its dependency on Russian fossil fuels through demand reduction, alternative energy sources, and rapid clean energy infrastructure development. The European Commission’s REPowerEU plan targets a two-thirds reduction in Russian gas imports by 2022 end, but stops short of total elimination until 2027 and lacks a detailed policy analysis for immediate energy security. A new report offers detailed strategies for the EU and the UK to quickly sever Russian gas dependence. It suggests enhancing the REPowerEU plan with additional gas reductions for electricity and adjusting gas storage targets. This report, aligning with other studies, outlines immediate strategies for a Russian gas embargo, assessing policy implications and climate commitments. Its integrated electricity and gas models confirm the feasibility of eliminating Russian gas dependency while maintaining supply security.
This study examines the environmental and economic viability of different fuel production methods as part of U.S. net-zero greenhouse gas emission strategies. It conducts lifecycle assessments for hydrogen (H2), synthetic natural gas (SNG), and Fischer-Tropsch liquid (FTL) fuels, considering three sources: biomass with carbon capture and storage (CCS), natural gas with CCS, and renewable electricity. The study finds that hydrogen production, especially from biomass with CCS, is more cost-effective and efficient in reducing greenhouse gas emissions than FTL and SNG. Sensitivity analysis reveals the significant impact of capital costs and capacity factors on the levelized costs of carbon mitigation (LCCM), with natural gas-based processes being particularly sensitive to feedstock price changes. Biomass-based fuels with CCS show the highest potential for carbon mitigation and become increasingly cost-effective at higher carbon pricing. These results emphasize the critical importance of biomass-based hydrogen production with CCS in achieving U.S. net-zero emissions goals.
The U.S. introduced a production tax credit (PTC) to encourage low-carbon hydrogen production, essential for a net-zero carbon economy. Hydrogen produced via electrolysis qualifies for the full subsidy if using carbon-free electricity, but may not if the electricity mix includes emitting resources. This study explores the effects of grid-connected electrolysis on the western U.S. power sector through 2030 under various clean hydrogen PTC implementations. It finds that subsidized grid-connected hydrogen production could induce higher emissions than fossil-based methods. Minimizing emissions requires grid-based hydrogen producers to match their electricity consumption hourly with clean, deliverable generation, effectively mirroring behind-the-meter carbon-free generation. Despite this, indirect emissions from competition for clean resources persist. The study suggests that stringent hourly matching standards consistently outperform other methods, with added costs less than $1 per kg and potentially negligible if clean, firm electricity resources are available. This approach addresses indirect emissions without significantly increasing production costs.
GenX is a highly-configurable, open source electricity resource capacity expansion model that incorporates several state-of-the-art practices in electricity system planning to offer improved decision support for a changing electricity landscape. GenX is a constrained linear or mixed integer linear optimization model that determines the portfolio of electricity generation, storage, transmission, and demand-side resource investments and operational decisions to meet electricity demand in one or more future planning years at lowest cost, while subject to a variety of power system operational constraints, resource availability limits, and other imposed environmental, market design, and policy constraints. GenX features a modular and transparent code structure developed in Julia + JuMP. The model is designed to be highly flexible and configurable for use in a variety of applications from academic research and technology evaluation to public policy and regulatory analysis and resource planning.
Long-duration energy storage (LDES) is a potential solution to intermittency in renewable energy generation. This study evaluated the role of LDES in decarbonized electricity systems and identified the cost and efficiency performance necessary for LDES to substantially reduce electricity costs and displace firm low-carbon generation. We find that energy storage capacity cost and discharge efficiency are the most important performance parameters. Charge/discharge capacity cost and charge efficiency play secondary roles. Energy capacity costs must be ≤US$20 kWh–1 to reduce electricity costs by ≥10%. With current demand profiles, energy capacity costs must be ≤US$1 kWh–1 to displace all modelled firm low-carbon generation technologies. Electrification of end uses in a northern latitude context makes full displacement of firm generation more challenging and requires performance combinations unlikely to be feasible with known LDES technologies. Finally, LDES systems with the greatest impact on electricity cost and firm generation have storage durations exceeding 100 h.
Wind, solar, and lithium-ion batteries have become more affordable, driving their adoption in the transition to a decarbonized electricity grid. However, these technologies have limitations in providing consistent power during extended periods of high demand when renewable generation may be insufficient. This challenge has led to increased interest in long-duration energy storage (LDES). LDES encompasses a wide range of options, making it difficult to identify promising pathways or prioritize research efforts. In recent research, we and our colleagues employed a comprehensive long-term electricity system planning model to analyze various combinations of five key LDES parameters across 14 scenarios. This extensive analysis helps navigate the diverse landscape of LDES technologies and provides essential cost and performance targets. It offers valuable insights to guide innovation and commercialization efforts, ensuring the development of efficient long-duration energy storage solutions for reliable grid operations, even in scenarios of prolonged high demand.
In decarbonized electricity systems with significant variable renewables, having at least one firm electricity generation technology is essential for reliability and cost reduction. These firm resources operate year-round and include low- and zero-carbon options like flexible resources (e.g., biogas or hydrogen combustion), capital-intensive resources (e.g., nuclear and geothermal), and intermediate resources (e.g., natural gas with CCS). This study explores nuclear, CCS, and zero-carbon fuel combustion roles in decarbonized electricity systems, showing their unique contributions. It analyzes data from three long-term electricity system models covering California and the U.S. Western Interconnection. Each firm technology significantly lowers costs compared to portfolios relying solely on renewables and energy storage. Having all these options optimizes utilization rates, reducing system costs by up to 10% compared to single firm resource scenarios. This analysis highlights diverse technology’s value in achieving emissions reduction goals while ensuring power sector reliability and affordability.
Achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. by mid-century requires a transformation of the energy workforce. This study examines the impact of increased labor compensation and domestic manufacturing on renewable energy technology costs, the overall cost of transitioning to net-zero emissions, and labor outcomes related to utility-scale solar photovoltaics (PV) and wind power. This study reveals that labor cost premiums and higher domestic content in wind and solar PV supply chains result in relatively minor increases in capital and operating costs. These cost increases can potentially be offset by improved labor productivity. Additionally, the study finds that technology cost premiums associated with labor-friendly policies have a minimal impact on renewable energy deployment and the overall transition cost to a net-zero emissions economy. Public policies, including tax credits and workforce development support, can help redistribute technology cost premiums to benefit both firms and workers in the renewable energy sector.
The Biden administration aims to cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 50%-52% below 2005 levels by 2030 and achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. These goals are attainable but require a collaborative, nation-building effort involving federal, state, local governments, the private sector, and communities to rapidly transform the U.S. energy system. While macro-scale energy modeling studies inform net-zero planning, they often lack the granularity needed to address real-world challenges. The Net-Zero America (NZA) study stands out for its detailed approach, offering spatial, temporal, and sector-specific pathways. These pathways rely on highly technologically ready solutions (Technology Readiness Level 6 or greater) and can achieve emissions targets akin to the Biden administration’s goals by 2030 and net-zero emissions by 2050. The study reveals similarities among pathways over the next decade, with annual spending on energy services as a percentage of GDP remaining relatively constant throughout the transition.
The Net Zero America study aims to inform and ground political, business, and societal conversations regarding what it would take for the U.S. to achieve an economy-wide target of net-zero emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050. Achieving this goal, i.e. building an economy that emits no more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than are permanently removed and stored each year, is essential to halt the buildup of climate-warming gases in the atmosphere and avert costly damages from climate change. A growing number of pledges are being made by major corporations, municipalities, states, and national governments to reach netzero emissions by 2050 or sooner. This study provides granular guidance on what getting to net-zero really requires and on the actions needed to translate these pledges into tangible progress.